Metodologie CSS

Modi codificati per scrivere CSS più puliti.

Rankings

Export
SatisfactionS
InterestI
UsageU
AwarenessA

Satisfaction, interest, usage, and awareness ratio rankings.

2019202020192020BEMAtomic CSS (Utility-first CSS)OOCSSSMACSSITCSSBEMAtomic CSS (Utility-first CSS)OOCSSSMACSSITCSSCUBE CSS86%82%81%83%77%66%78%67%84%78%61%

Technologies with less than 10% awareness not included. Each ratio is defined as follows:

  • Satisfaction: would use again / (would use again + would not use again)
  • Interest: want to learn / (want to learn + not interested)
  • Usage: (would use again + would not use again) / total
  • Awareness: (total - never heard) / total

Experience Over Time

Export
Percents%
CountΣ

Overview of opinions on the technologies surveyed over time.

Non lo userei più
Non interessato
Lo userei ancora
Interessato
Mai sentito
2019202020192020

BEM

2019202020192020

Atomic CSS (Utility-first CSS)

2019202020192020

OOCSS

2019202020192020

SMACSS

2019202020192020

ITCSS

Technologies with only one year of data are not included.

Positive/Negative Split

Export

This chart splits positive (“want to learn”, ”would use again”) vs negative (“not interested”, “would not use again”) experiences on both sides of a central axis.

Bar thickness represents the number of respondents aware of a technology.

Non lo userei piùNon interessatoLo userei ancoraInteressatoAwareness50%40%30%20%10%0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%50%40%30%20%10%0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%BEMAtomic CSS (Utility-first CSS)ITCSSCUBE CSSSMACSSOOCSS

BEM
Completion percentage: 80.9% (9302)
Completion percentage: 80.9% (9302)

Export
Percents%
CountΣ

2019

8.3% 8.3% 9.2% 9.2% 52.1% 52.1% 12.7% 12.7% 17.7% 17.7%

2020

12.1% 12.1% 8.7% 8.7% 54.7% 54.7% 9.5% 9.5% 15% 15%
Non lo userei più
Non interessato
Lo userei ancora
Interessato
Mai sentito

Atomic CSS (Utility-first CSS)
Completion percentage: 81.1% (9323)
Completion percentage: 81.1% (9323)

Export
Percents%
CountΣ

2019

17.7% 17.7% 20.1% 20.1% 24.5% 24.5% 32.8% 32.8%

2020

14.8% 14.8% 30.9% 30.9% 19.9% 19.9% 28.2% 28.2%
Non lo userei più
Non interessato
Lo userei ancora
Interessato
Mai sentito

OOCSS
Completion percentage: 81.1% (9325)
Completion percentage: 81.1% (9325)

Export
Percents%
CountΣ

2019

20.3% 20.3% 15.7% 15.7% 18.4% 18.4% 41% 41%

2020

21.8% 21.8% 12.1% 12.1% 13.2% 13.2% 46.8% 46.8%
Non lo userei più
Non interessato
Lo userei ancora
Interessato
Mai sentito
We asked members of the CSS community to share their “pick of the year”

My 2020 Pick: The CSS Cascade

With this blog post, Amelia Wattenberger didn't just go the extra mile, she ran a whole marathon! The animations and quiz will ensure you finally understand the CSS cascade.

We asked members of the CSS community to share their “pick of the year”

Sacha Greif

Creator of this survey

SMACSS
Completion percentage: 81.2% (9331)
Completion percentage: 81.2% (9331)

Export
Percents%
CountΣ

2019

18.7% 18.7% 15.1% 15.1% 16.3% 16.3% 45.6% 45.6%

2020

20% 20% 12.1% 12.1% 11.8% 11.8% 50.1% 50.1%
Non lo userei più
Non interessato
Lo userei ancora
Interessato
Mai sentito

ITCSS
Completion percentage: 81% (9313)
Completion percentage: 81% (9313)

Export
Percents%
CountΣ

2019

9.6% 9.6% 75.7% 75.7%

2020

10.9% 10.9% 7.7% 7.7% 72.7% 72.7%
Non lo userei più
Non interessato
Lo userei ancora
Interessato
Mai sentito

CUBE CSS
Completion percentage: 81.1% (9317)
Completion percentage: 81.1% (9317)

Export
Percents%
CountΣ

2020

7.4% 7.4% 84.1% 84.1%
Non lo userei più
Non interessato
Lo userei ancora
Interessato
Mai sentito

Other Tools
Completion percentage: 0.9% (99)
Completion percentage: 0.9% (99)

Export
Percents%
CountΣ

Other tools in this category (freeform answers).

Overall Happiness

Export
Percents%
CountΣ

On a scale of one (very unhappy) to five (very happy), how happy are developers with the current overall state of this category?

0%10%20%30%40%50%Percentage of UsersVery UnhappyUnhappyNeutralHappyVery HappyHappiness0%10%20%30%40%50%2.4%2.4%7%7%50.5%50.5%31.6%31.6%8.5%8.5%

Recommended Resources

Scalable Modular Architecture for CSS (SMACSS)

CSS architecture expert Jonathan Snook shares his experience building large sites with large teams to make your CSS more maintainable using his SMACSS methodology.
Thanks to our partners for supporting us! Learn more.
« Previous: CSS FrameworksNext: CSS-in-JS »
Charts built with Nivo. Hosted by Netlify.
Domande? Trovato un bug? Apri una issue. Join us on Discord.
Press option/alt to enable translator mode.