Units & SelectorsPre-/Post-processors
English
ČeskyDeutschEnglishEspañolفارسیFrançaisHindiItalianoPortuguêsРусскийУкраїнськаSvenskaTürkçeIndonesia简体中文正體中文日本語
Completion percentage: 46%
Completion percentage: 46%
Completion percentage: 60%
Completion percentage: 60%
Completion percentage: 67%
Completion percentage: 67%
Completion percentage: 18%
Completion percentage: 18%
Completion percentage: 42%
Completion percentage: 42%
Completion percentage: 16%
Completion percentage: 16%
Completion percentage: 44%
Completion percentage: 44%
Completion percentage: 39%
Completion percentage: 39%
Completion percentage: 84%
Completion percentage: 84%
Completion percentage: 84%
Completion percentage: 84%
Completion percentage: 37%
Completion percentage: 37%
Completion percentage: 66%
Completion percentage: 66%
Completion percentage: 39%
Completion percentage: 39%
Completion percentage: 51%
Completion percentage: 51%
Completion percentage: 73%
Completion percentage: 73%
Completion percentage: 36%
Completion percentage: 36%
Technologies
The CSS ecosystem is going through a renewal of sorts, as older mainstays like Bootstrap now have to accomodate newer entrants like Tailwind CSS. To say nothing of the whole CSS-in-JS movement which, while it has yet to cross over to the CSS mainstream, is nonetheless quite dynamic.
Satisfaction vs Usage
Export
Satisfaction[
Interest[
This chart shows each technology’s satisfaction ratio over its total user count. It can be divided into four quadrants:
ASSESS: Low usage, high satisfaction. Technologies worth keeping an eye on.
ADOPT: High usage, high satisfaction. Safe technologies to adopt.
AVOID: Low usage, low satisfaction. Technologies probably best avoided currently.
ANALYZE: High usage, low satisfaction. Reassess these technologies if you're currently using them.